Go back to Day 2
Go back to Day 1
Some Conversations on Politics and Government
H-, the project manager at W-, is from Davao City,
Philippines, and also lived and worked in Manila before relocating to Surabaya
about five years ago. He is married with three children, but his family
remained in Manila when he relocated for work, and he sees them about every three
months or so. I’m not sure the reason that his family didn’t move with him to
Indonesia, and I will let him bring that up if he chooses, but I don’t feel
right asking about it. If I had to guess, I would assume that it’s either that
his family is culturally Christian and didn’t want to move to a Muslim country,
or else that Manila (not having been there myself) is a much more cosmopolitan
city than Surabaya, and it would be a step down quality of life-wise.
H- is an excellent project manager, extremely detail-oriented,
organized, intelligent, and proactive. He is wonderful for me to work with in
this situation, where I’m arriving not knowing anything about the work culture,
and also lacking confidence in this particular process equipment. However,
hyper-competent project management on a site level requires a bit of an
autocratic streak, which H- also possesses. Please keep that in mind regarding
his political opinions.
At lunch on Saturday, H- mentioned that Indonesia should be
a very wealthy country, with all of their riches in oil, natural gas, and other
natural resources, but that their government is corrupt. He didn’t go into
specifics on this opinion, but that provided him a segue into his praise for
Rodrigo Duterte, president of the Philippines and former mayor of Davao City.
At least in the U.S. lefty media that I favor, Duterte is quite
unpopular, regarded as something of a murderous despot because of the
extrajudicial killings of drug addicts that he has directed and/or championed.
I’ve often been curious about why Duterte’s approval ratings in his country are
so high (consistently more than 70%, I’ve read) if he’s so awful.
Well, H- was very clear about his reasons for his strong
support of Duterte:
- He’s provided much-increased financial assistance to the public and military hospitals in Manila, where care is now free of charge
- He’s streamlined the permitting process for businesses and reduced corruption by promising a decision on permits in something like 10 days
- He’s reduced corruption drastically in government and police; supposedly you can’t bribe Manila police anymore to get out of tickets
- He personally (and brutally) responds to business owner’s complaints; H- told a (possibly apocryphal – hey, this is all possibly apocryphal) story about a restauranteur in Manila who had an Australian patron who was smoking and wouldn’t put out his cigarette, even though public smoking in Manila is outlawed. The restauranteur called the government, and Duterte personally drove over to the restaurant and put a gun to the Australian’s head, and said he would either eat the cigarette or get his brains blown out. So, the story goes, the man ate the cigarette.
- And finally, he’s made Manila and other cities safe by either forcing drug addicts to surrender to be placed in rehab, or else they are killed. H- said that drug users get three warnings to surrender before they are killed.
- Generally, H- described Duterte as a man of impeccable integrity, doing what needed to be done to clean up corrupted institutions and reduce crime.
There’s definitely some stuff to like there, even if I
disagree with some of the methods. I’m a softie, but maybe just arrest the
addicts on the fourth try and send them to rehab forcibly rather than having
them killed. Duterte has advertised himself as a man who Gets Things Done and
Doesn’t Truck With Any Bullshit, and he delivers on those promises. I can see
where that would be very appealing to a significant portion of the electorate.
After Trump was elected, I was hoping that maybe the silver
lining would be that he could actually deliver on some useful things (less
fucking around with overseas military interventions, for instance, or not
kowtowing to the Israeli lobby) because of his lack of interest in decorum, but
he has shown himself to be a dismal doer of things as well as an abominable
person. He’s just a worthless shithead blowhard who wants to be praised for
accomplishing things without actually doing them. At least Duterte is an
effective doer of things, and I can see where a fellow doer of things like H-
would see a kindred spirit.
My driver for part of the journey to Bromo, Leonard, is a
Christian who grew up east of Bromo and has lived in Surabaya for the last
twenty-plus years. He had very positive things to say about Joko Widodo (known
as Jokowi), who is the current president of Indonesia. Jokowi was mayor of the
city of Surakarta and governor of the state of Jakarta before being elected
president in 2014. Leonard praised Jokowi’s ability to get things done, as
well, citing a new highway running the length of Java that was nearly complete
as evidence. Also, he pointed out that Jokowi had lowered the barriers for
immigrants to enter Indonesia, which Leonard considers to be positive. Leonard
expected Jokowi to be re-elected easily in 2019.
I asked whether Leonard’s church was near those that were
bombed last month in Surabaya, and he said yes, that he was close enough that
he heard the explosions when they happened. He was clearly saddened by the
bombings, but he pointed out that Surabaya is a misguided place for ISIS to try
to sow discord (the bombings were carried out by five members of a single
family from Syria, is how it was explained to me). Surabaya as he described it,
is a place where different religions respect each other and generally get along
well. He said that it’s a place where anyone, even children, can walk the
streets safely, and said that Jakarta was not like that. I can testify to the
fact that I’ve felt very safe walking in Surabaya.
Leonard said that Surabaya mourned for two days after the
bombings, and that the police presence has been more noticeable since then, but
that after those two days everything got back to normal and people still treat
each other the same way that they did before. I was glad to hear that because
almost 17 years after 9/11, the U.S. is nowhere near that point. So, it’s not
like terrorism has to lead to permanent mistrust and suspicion among different
ethnic and religious groups. It’s almost as if the U.S. is worse at this than
other places.
Go To Day 5
Go To Day 5
No comments:
Post a Comment